spacer
Ransom Fellowship
spacer articles movies music books art faith discernment spacer
 
articles
publications
search
people
links
faq
blank
about
contact
press kit
Ransom Blogs
spacer
spacer
current article  
spacer
spacer
spacer
The Power of Ideas spacer The Power of Ideas
BY: Denis Haack
spacer
Over the years scholars have looked back on Stalin’s bloody and brutal dictatorship and tried to explain how such a man could have done such horrible things. The explanations—a traumatic childhood, a clever but unintelligent power hungry thug—are now being shown to be untrue. Since the collapse of the Soviet empire, archives have been opened that allow access to Stalin’s rule in detail never before possible. Stephen Kotkin, historian at Princeton, is writing a series of books using this new material, and recently published the first volume, Stalin: Paradoxes of Power, 1878-1928 (Penguin). Kotkin refutes the explanations, both Freudian and political, and insists the evidence points in another direction. In a review of Kotkin’s book in The Atlantic (November 2014, p. 46-50), Anne Applebaum summarizes his conclusions:

The Bolsheviks, Kotkin rightly notes, were driven by “a combination of ideas or habits of thought, especially profound antipathy to markets and all things bourgeois, as well as no-holds-barred revolutionary methods.” Right after the revolution, these convictions led them to outlaw private trade, nationalize industry, confiscate property, seize grain and redistribute it in the cities—all policies that required mass violence to implement. In 1918, Lenin himself suggested that peasants should be forced to deliver their grain to the state, and that those who refused should be “shot on the spot.”

Although some of these policies, including forced grain requisitions, were temporarily abandoned in the 1920s, Stalin brought them back at the end of the decade, eventually enlarging upon them. And no wonder: they were the logical consequence of every book he had read and every political argument he had ever had. Stalin, as Kotkin reveals him, was neither a dull bureaucrat nor an outlaw but a man shaped by rigid adherence to a puritanical doctrine. His violence was not the product of his subconscious but of the Bolshevik engagement with Marxist-Leninist ideology.
(p. 48)

In other words, Stalin believed a set of ideas, and believed in them so passionately that he was willing to put them into practice regardless of the cost.

Applebaum recognizes that this view of things is both countercultural and important if we are to correctly understand our world.

Kotkin’s first volume ends with Stalin's announcement of his decision to collectivize Soviet agriculture. Enacting that policy would require the displacement, the imprisonment, and eventually the orchestrated starvation of millions of people, and it resulted in Stalin's complete political triumph.

In the contemporary West, we often assume that perpetrators of mass violence must be insane or irrational, but as Kotkin tells the story, Stalin was neither. And in its way, the idea of Stalin as a rational and extremely intelligent man, bolstered by an ideology sufficiently powerful to justify the deaths of many millions of people, is even more terrifying. It means we might want to take more seriously the pronouncements of the Russian politicians who have lately argued for the use of nuclear weapons against the Baltic states, or of the ISIS leaders who call for the deaths of all Christians and Jews. Just because their language sounds strange to us doesn't mean that they, and those who follow them, don’t find it compelling, or that they won’t pursue their logic to its ultimate conclusion.
(p. 50)

A few reflections on the power of ideas come to mind
-Stalin’s example shows this is not merely a religious problem. A secular ideology is as able to motivate believers to dangerous fanaticism as can religious dogma. It is a human problem.

-Christians must remember that having access to absolute truth does not mean that all we believe is absolutely true. As we move from scripture to meaning to principle to policy to practice we must see our ideas as increasingly tentative and incomplete. Belief without humility is antithetical to the claims of Christ.

-Any belief system, secular or religious that is not self-correcting, that does not contain within it the resources and motivation needed to reform its own application is dangerous.

-Foundational beliefs work themselves out into a narrative when we live them out. It’s important to hear people’s stories and to tell the story of scripture, to hear people’s foundational ideas and clarify our own. Ideas are not neutral, we all have them, they have consequences, and the consequences matter.


image

Questions:
-

Source:
-
spacer
spacer
spacer
about the author
spacer
Denis Haack
Denis is the author of The Rest of Success: What the World Didn’t Tell You About Having It All and has written articles for such journals as Reformation & Revival Journal, Eternity, Covenant, and World. He holds a Master of Arts in Theological Studies degree from Covenant Seminary in St. Louis.
spacer spacer spacer
other articles from this author
spacer
The Pilgrim’s Regress (C.S. Lewis, 1933)

Welcoming strangers

Is Everything Political?

spacer
related articles
spacer A Life-giving, Transformative Ordinary

What Do Students Need from Me?

Nourishing Our Souls

Non-Christians Reflect on Calling

Discipleship in a Secular Age: Engaging the Culture with Charles Taylor and James Smith

Finding Silence

The Gnostic Life

The Uncomfortable Path to Maturity

In Praise of Inefficiency

Pilgrim Stories: Evangelism is a Dirty Word to Millennials

How Committed is Too Committed?

Seeing beyond the traces

I Am Addicted to Diversion. Are You?

A Prayer for Terrorists

Of Things Unseen

Virtues by an atheist

Fishsauce & Mayonaisse

Facing Guns and Horror

Keeping Up in a Fast Paced World

Driving with the Brakes On: Why Doing Justice Is So Difficult

spacer
spacer spacer spacer bottom
Ransom Fellowship
Ransom Fellowship
spacer This web site is old and creaky. The email function functions poorly when it functions at all. Worse, it all looks old. So we are starting work on building a new site, and hope to have it functioning by fall.

Our vision will not change, nor will our attempt in this little spot of the Internet to invite you to join us in thinking about the things that matter most. Thanks for visiting.

Denis & Margie Haack
Anita Gorder
spacer
spacer
bottom

Home | Articles | Publications | Search | People | Links | FAQ | Donate | About | Contact | Press

All material © 2000-2017 Ransom Fellowship Ministries
Site design by JaM Multimedia