spacer
Ransom Fellowship
spacer articles movies music books art faith discernment spacer
 
articles
publications
search
people
links
faq
blank
about
contact
press kit
Ransom Blogs
spacer
spacer
current article  
spacer
spacer
spacer
You Can Count On Me (Kenneth Lonergan, 2000) spacer You Can Count On Me (Kenneth Lonergan, 2000)
BY: Andrew H. Trotter, Jr.
spacer
Some movies settle for being “light entertainment;” others ask profound questions about “life, the universe, and everything” from the first frame. We seem to live in a time when light entertainment is defined by the grotesque and repulsive (cf. There’s Something About Mary or Me, Myself and Irene), but the movie industry cannot give the viewing public enough of it nevertheless. On the other hand, movies with depth are as common as snowstorms on a summer’s day in Florida. One tires of waiting for them and even when they arrive, the films are often pretentious and shallow since they build on the uncertain foundations of humanism, absurdism or both.


Just when you are ready to throw in the towel, a movie comes along that is both funny and poignant, reflective and enjoyable. You Can Count on Me is just such a film.


Written, directed and even acted in by Kenneth Lonergan, Count is built around the brief visit of a rootless, undisciplined twenty-something to the homestead where his sister and her son live in upstate New York. Orphaned in childhood, Samantha and Terry Prescott have a complicated but deep love for each other that forms the heart of the movie, and a subplot of the growing relationship between Terry and Samantha’s son Rudy movingly mirrors that love, while developing its own themes.


Count could have been the sappy telling of another “relationship” story where two lonely, dysfunctional characters find true happiness in the end by learning to live with each other and triumphing over the world together. But none of that for Lonergan. Sammy and Terry will not so easily give up their stubborn, independent, coping mechanisms, hard won in starkly different ways, and the film rocks achingly back and forth between their unselfish love and concern for each other and their self-centered adherence to themselves and their contempt for each other’s choices.


Sammy, played by Laura Linney who has been nominated for an Oscar for her performance, is a loan officer at a bank. An avid church-goer, devoted mother, and trustworthy employee, she nevertheless has learned to handle the demons of her pointless life by avoidance, finding the comfort of sex and a cigarette the only means of really relaxing.


Mark Ruffalo plays her brother Terry, a drifter and his sister’s polar opposite. In and out of jail, jobs and even states (he has lived vaguely in the South and in Alaska), Terry stubbornly holds to a philosophy of movement. He avoids anything that even smells of permanence.


If the movie had stayed there, it would have been like too many others since Easy Rider: existential loners find each other and, though they remain in their despair, they at least have each other. Yawn.


But Count does something radically different for this secular age: it introduces the question of God. He is creeping back into film after a long absence; comedies like Keeping the Faith and Dogma and action pictures like Stigma and End of Days are becoming common. But dramas—“real life” pictures as it were—have lagged behind; The Big Kahuna comes to mind, but little else. Perhaps an unbelieving Hollywood doesn’t know how to even begin to write religion, but it is a gap that the movie-going public seems to want closed. Even Bergman’s The Seventh Seal is being shown at a movie club in my hometown, a sure sign both of interest and the lack of substantial films to satisfy that interest.


In three scenes of extraordinary, quiet power, You Can Count On Me portrays many of the questions people really ask of their pastors (and comments that are made to them by those who don’t believe). The questions of God’s existence gently invade the story and force the viewer to ask themselves and the characters: What does matter in life? Where do I find a “still point in a turning world?” Are there answers to the mess I find myself trapped in?


Lonergan was nominated for an Academy Award for his script. Clear, simple editing, direction and camera work also help create an atmosphere of reality in small town America, a quality often missing in Hollywood these days. Even independent, small, relational films are set in exotic climates like the New Mexico of The Tao of Steve for instance. But this movie feels like you and me. It gives us a window into that silent majority out there who really do live lives of quiet desperation as they go about their daily tasks of work, love, eating and praying. And Count offers no pat answers for that despair. As we all know, neither does life.


This review will not go further; you must take a friend and discuss with them whether the responses the movie gives are true, realistic, neither or both. But go at all costs; you won’t find a more challenging film for discussing the big questions of life.


You Can Count On Me credits:


Cast:
Amy Ryan (Rachel Prescott)
Michael Countryman (Thomas Prescott)
Adam LeFevre (Sheriff Darryl)
Halley Feiffer (Amy)
Whitney Vance (Young Sammy Prescott)
Peter Kerwin (Young Terry Prescott)
Betsy Aidem (Minister)
Laura Linney (Sammy Prescott)
Rory Culkin (Rudy)
J. Smith-Cameron (Mabel)
Matthew Broderick (Brian Everett)
Jon Tenney (Bob Steegerson)
Gaby Hoffmann (Sheila)
Mark Ruffalo (Terry Prescott)
Lisa Altomare (Waitress)
Kenneth Lonergan (Ron)


Director: Kenneth Lonergan


Screenwriter: Kenneth Lonergan


Producers: Keith Abell, Steve Carlis, Donald C. Carter, Barbara De Fina, Jill Footlick, John Hart, Julian Iragorri, Robert Kravis & others


Cinematographer: Stephen Kazmierski


Costumes: Melissa Toth


Original Music: Lesley Barber


Runtime: 111 minutes


Rated R for language, some drug use and a scene of sexuality

image

Questions:
1. What was your initial reaction to the film (music, setting)? Did the filmmaker involve your emotions? What were they, and how did the film provoke them?

2. What are the effects on children of losing parents? How do different siblings respond differently, based on order in family? What can this kind of loss do to someone’s temperament, especially as it forms later in life?

3. What details in the film bring out the personalities of each character? How much can we tell about a person based on such details, and should we even do so?

4. Terry is a model for the person running away from his past—is it wrong to do so? Are there better options? Many of the characters are trying to change who they are-can we change who we are? How? How do we define we you are?

5. Terry says early on, “I’m not really looking for anything; I’m just trying to get on with life.” Do you think he really believes that? Why or why not? Is anyone able to live by this principle?

6. Why do Bob and Sammy have an affair? What do they see in each other that they want? Do you think either of the two is acting purely selfishly?

7. Do you think the affair is justified? Do you think the filmmaker tries to justify it? Why, and how so, or why not?

8. Why doesn’t Sam want to marry Bob?

9. Terry’s faults are easy to see, but what do you see good about Terry?

10. When Sammy approaches her pastor about “fornication,” he responds differently than she hoped. Why does Sammy respond to his answers the way she does? Do you think that people want to be held responsible for their actions? Why or why not? Do you think this pastor is indicative of the state of the church in our culture? How so or why not? The writer and director of the film, Kenneth Lonergan, plays the pastor—is this significant?

11. The pastor asks Terry, “Do you think your life is important?” How would you answer that, and on what basis?

12. Terry says he doesn’t want to believe so he won’t feel guilty; he wants to believe because something is true. Do you agree with Terry’s response? How or how not? Do people believe out of guilt? Do they refuse to believe because of terminology: God, religion, etc.? What other reasons do people have for either believing or not believing that aren’t legitimate? What are legitimate grounds for believing that anything’s true, much less “religion”?

13. Sammy says she gets into bad situations because she feels sorry for people. How do you understand that? What’s the cause of that? How is that mindset both helpful and destructive?

14. When we feel confined by life circumstances, how do we react? What do we do when the people we expect to have answers don’t have them? When the people we think we can count on aren’t there for us? How does that affect the way we treat other people?

15. What do we do if we find that no one’s there for us the way we want them to be? Since no one can be exactly the way we want them to be, not even ourselves, are you content to settle for this? Is there any other option?

16. To what degree do disappointments affect our ability to trust people? What other repercussions do we experience? How do we deal with them?

17. How does Terry’s presence affect Sam’s life? Why? What’s both good and bad about it? How does Rudy affect Terry? Why? Good and bad?

18. Regarding Sammy’s decision to have Terry leave, how do we make decisions regarding our love for people (i.e. how do we prioritize love)?

19. Like Sammy and Terry, who were literally orphaned, increasing numbers of Gen-Xer’s and -Yer’s are growing up orphaned, either literally or figuratively (parents always working, emotionally absent, etc.). How should we respond as a culture? As individuals?

Source:
--

spacer
spacer
spacer
about the author
spacer
Andrew H. Trotter, Jr.
Drew Trotter is the president of the Center for Christian Study in Charlottesville, VA, and has taught at the seminary level for more than twenty-five years. However, there is no evidence that his teaching has ever done anything for anyone but provide a lasting, non-invasive cure for insomnia, so he wonders whether or not he actually should include this impressive statistic in a blurb that is being distributed to the general public. Nevertheless, he acknowledges that descriptions such as these are important at some level for readers of the Ransom Fellowship website, so, for this very limited clientele, he has decided in the affirmative on this crucial issue. On a second equally crucial issue, you will be glad to know that he has decided to allow this picture of him to remain on the website, though he has no idea when or where it was taken, or even if it is actually of him, it bears so little resemblance to the ridiculous features he looks at each morning in the mirror. To him, it kind of looks like Buddha, though, and for some reason, he likes that. Drew has also lectured on film and culture at seminaries, churches and colleges throughout the eastern United States and in California. He even spoke once in Iowa. Oh, yeah, and in Canada, too. However, there is no evidence that his teaching, etc., etc. Drew and his wife Marie, a second-grade teacher at the Covenant School, have three sons, a daughter-in-law, and two grandsons. Anyone who has read this far must know that Marie is a saint to have honored that choice she made thirty-four years ago so faithfully. Our oldest son Andrew, a real estate developer in Atlanta, is married to Kelly, and is the father of Hugh and Jack. Do not presume that you know anything about sports of any kind until you have passed his crucible, and under no circumstances should you bet against him on the golf course. Christopher, our second son, is a financial person in Atlanta. God alone knows what Christopher actually does at the office. Christopher is, however, our resident expert on Nordic myths, having traveled extensively in Scandinavia. Michael is a waiter of tables, who lives in Venice, California, and has appeared in two films so far with, his father believes, many more acting roles to come. At least his father hopes so because waiting tables is such a drag, but mostly because Drew is going to need someone to support him in his old age. Drew knows Michael will do this, or, when Michael becomes famous, Drew will conduct interviews about him with People magazine.
spacer spacer spacer
other articles from this author
spacer
Gladiator (Ridley Scott, 2000)

Hours, The (Stephen Daldry, 2002)

In The Bedroom (Todd Field, 2001)

spacer
related articles
spacer Superbad (Greg Mottola, 2007)

No Country For Old Men (Coen Brothers, 2007)

Reign Over Me (Mike Binder, 2007)

Heavy Metal In Baghdad (VBS.TV, 2007)

Apatow and Aristotle on Friendship

Away We Go (Sam Mendes, 2009)

How Stories End

Doubt (John Patrick Shanley, 2008)

Milk (Gus Van Sant, 2008)

Lumière v. Méliès: Cinematic Dichotomy

Valkyrie (Bryan Singer, 2008)

Stranger Than Fiction (Mark Forster, 2006)

There Will Be Blood (Paul Thomas Anderson, 2008)

Nanking (Bill Guttentag & Dan Sturman, 2007)

Into the Wild (Sean Penn, 2007)

Atonement (Joe Wright, 2008)

Incredibles, The (Brad Bird, 2004)

Neo-pagan sexuality

Lives of Others, The (Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck, 2006)

The Painted Veil (John Curran, 2007)

spacer
spacer spacer spacer bottom
Ransom Fellowship
Ransom Fellowship
spacer It's interesting how the notion of being in a story seems deeply human, even at a time when many doubt that a Story exists that speaks to all of humanity, history and reality. Still, this is the theme that animates films like Stranger Than Fiction and The Book of Eli. The possibility that The Story of Creation, Fall, Redemption & Restoration in the Scriptures fulfills our deepest yearnings is the hope that causes us to maintain this web site. We hope you will join the conversation.

Denis & Margie

spacer
spacer
bottom

Home | Articles | Publications | Search | People | Links | FAQ | Donate | About | Contact | Press

All material © 2000-2010 Ransom Fellowship Ministries
Site design by JaM Multimedia